The number of working women has been on the rise for the
past five decades, so Nerdwallet.com recently crunched the numbers to find out the best cities
for women in the workforce. The publication analyzed 522 cities, factoring in
women's earnings, income equality and population growth to come up with its
list.
The following cities emerged at the top (included are the
median earnings for full-time, year-round female workers in each city):
Rank
|
City
|
Median Earnings
|
% of Men’s Earnings
|
1
|
Aurora, CO
|
$39,712
|
95.44%
|
2
|
Austin, TX
|
$40,356
|
93.34%
|
3
|
Washington, DC
|
$60,116
|
90.06%
|
4
|
Albuquerque, NM
|
$38,537
|
90.96%
|
5
|
Fresno, CA
|
$34,469
|
92.49%
|
6
|
Oakland, CA
|
$48,465
|
96.22%
|
7
|
Minneapolis, MN
|
$42,331
|
90.56%
|
8
|
Sacramento, CA
|
$41,849
|
93.25%
|
9
|
Milwaukee, WI
|
$36,020
|
93.09%
|
10
|
Indianapolis, IN
|
$36,297
|
88.37%
|
The
list of 10 best medium-sized cities for women in the workforce includes Kent (WA),
LeHigh Acres(FL), Richmond (CA), Durham (NC), Syracuse (NY), The Woodlands (TX),
Vallejo (CA), Inglewood (CA), Berkeley (CA) and Brandon (FL).
The
list of 10 best small cities for women in the workforce includes Pharr (TX),
Sandy Springs (GA), Hesperia (CA), Edinburg (TX), Whittier (CA), Union City (NJ),
Concord (NC), Rio Rancho (NM), San Leandro (CA) and Clifton (NJ).
CA
must be doing something right if they have 3 in the large, 3 in the medium and
3 in the small cities! SC is sadly absent from large, medium-sized or small
cities.
Courtesy: Realtor Magazine & Nerdwallet.com
No comments:
Post a Comment